Open I Raded GPT-4.1 This morning, to direct challenges to rivals AnthropicFor, for, for,. Google And Ze. Through this, the GPT -4.1 is in position as a production AI model, after increasing its coding and context capabilities in a one million token window and aggressively reducing API prices. If you are managing a budget or producing a scale code, this price shake -up may make your quarter.
Upgraded in performance at Costo Prices
The new GPT -4.1 series has a serious upgrade, which includes a 54.6 % win rate on the SWE Bench coding benchmark, which has a lot of jumps from the previous version. But the buzz is not just about the better quality. Real world test by qodo.ai GPT -4.1 defeated Anthropic’s Claude 3.7 Sonit in 54.9 % cases on the original gut hub bridge requests, mainly less false positive and more precise, thanks to the related code suggestions ..
Openai’s new The price structureApply to Target Cheap – Finally Running AI Expenses Recide for Careful Teams:
| Model | Input cost (per mTOK) | Output Cost (per MTOK) |
| GPT-4.1 | $ 2.00 | $ 8.00 |
| GPT -4.1 Money | 40 0.40 | 60 1.60 |
| GPT-4.1 nano | 10 0.10 | 40 0.40 |
Here stand out? It is particularly beneficial for coding and conversation agents – 75 % of the catching discounts, which effectively encouraged developers to improve reuse immediately.
To feel the heat.
Anthropic’s cloud models have established their foundation by balanced power and price. But the bold pricing of GPT -4.1 significantly reduces their market position:
| Model | Input cost (per mTOK) | Output Cost (per MTOK) |
| Claude 3.7 Swant | $ 3.00 | .00 15.00 |
| Claude 3.5 Haiko | 80 0.80 | $ 4.00 |
| Turn off the third job | .00 15.00 | .00 75.00 |
Anthropic still offers compulsive catching waivers (up to 90 % of the scenarios), but the benefit of the base price of GPT -4.1 and the developer’s focus improvement position is to appeal to Openi as a budget friend selection and specifically appeal to small teams.
Hidden financial defects
The complexity of gym pricing in the developer circles is becoming increasingly notorious. According to the Jemani’s tired structure of the prompt shield – especially with a powerful 2.5 pro variable. Increase faster financial dreams Due to the surcharges for long input and outpts that double the range of some context:
| Model | Input cost (per mTOK) | Output Cost (per MTOK) |
| Gemini 2.5 Pro ≤200K | $ 1.25 | $ 10.00 |
| Gemini 2.5 Pro> 200k | 50 2.50 | .00 15.00 |
| Gemini 2.0 flash | 10 0.10 | 40 0.40 |
In addition, Gemini lacks automatic billing shutdowns, in which the quick shield says developers have been exposed to refuse curtain attacks. It seems that GPT -4.1 can be predicted, a strategic counter of the complexity and hidden risks of Gemini.
Context is the king
The Zee’s Grook series, which was fought by Elon Musk, recently unveiled his API prices for his latest models. The last week:
| Model | Input cost per mto | Output (per MTOK) |
| GROK-3 | $ 3.00 | .00 15.00 |
| Grook 3 Fast Beta | $ 5.00 | .00 25.00 |
| Grook 3 Money Fast | 60 0.60 | $ 4.00 |
A complex element with Grook has been the window of its context. Kasturi said Grook can handle 3 1 million tokens (like a claim of GPT -4.1), but the current API Actually exits the maximum in 131k tokensWell, this promise is lacking. This contradiction made some criticisms of consumers on the X, which pointed to Zee’s slightly excessive marketing.
For developers testing GROK vs GPT-4.1, it is noteworthy: GPT-4.1 offers full 1M context as advertised, while Grook’s API (at least at the time of launch). In terms of pricing transparency, Zee’s model is straight on paper, but the maximum payment limits for “sharp” services and the need for a small player show the business relationships that are trying to counter industry giants.
Wind Surf has made a big bet on the developer appeal of GPT 4.1
Demonstrating high confidence in the practical benefits of GPT-4.1, the Wind Surf-AI-powered IDE-powered IDE offered extraordinary. Free, unlimited GPT-4.1 trial for a week. This is not just generosity. This is a strategic game that once offers developers GPT -4.1’s capabilities and cost savings experience, it will be a rigorous sale to return to the preir or less capable model.
A new period of competitive AI prices
Open’s GPT -4.1 is only shaking the price game, it is probably setting new standards for the AI development community. Exactly, with reliable outputs that are certified by built -in reservations against external standards, simple pricing transparency, and running expenses, the GPT -4.1 closed model APIS is convinced to have a default selection.
The developers should give themselves a blow – not only for cheap AI, but also the domino -impact revolution of this price can be mobilized to maintain humanity, Google, and Zi fast. Earlier, for the cost, complexity, or both limited teams through both, GPT -4.1 may be a category for a new wave of AI -powered innovation.
Credit : venturebeat.com
