Is the creation of artificial general intelligence comparable to the development of an atomic bomb? And in that case, how can America protect itself from dominant rivals? For example, Marc Andreessen, an investor from Silicon Valley, is anxious.
The Manhattan Project helped usher in the Cold War era of superpowers, partially because Soviet spies infiltrated Los Alamos, stealing secrets that helped it quickly amass its own nuclear arsenal as a strategic deterrent. Decades later, the United States may find itself in a recent arms race, this time with China over its transformative AGI technology.
Viewed through this lens, Andreessen argues that US AI labs are the “security equivalent of Swiss cheese” through which secrets can easily be passed on to Beijing via modern-day the Rosenberg couple.
“The conclusion is clear: OpenAI should be nationalized immediately,” wrote co-founder and general partner Andreessen Horowitz in a battle of words with fellow VC luminary Vinod Khosla, one of OpenAI’s early investors.
OpenAI didn’t immediately reply to a request for comment.
Andreessen’s suggestion that the disruptive startup behind ChatGPT and Sora – and others prefer it – could prove a tempting target for Beijing’s spy network has found credibility. Elon Musk, for example, interjected that “it would certainly be easy for a state entity to steal his intellectual property.”
It will surely be easy for a state actor to steal his IP address
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 3, 2024
Khosla has previously defended OpenAI’s decision to publish less and less of its research amid its controversial transformation from a nonprofit to a business entity backed by Microsoft. The company is currently being sued by Musk for violating its founding agreement.
“authoritarian artificial intelligence”
Andreessen, who has declared a “passion” for libertarianism, explained that he doesn’t actually want government intervention. This statement was largely intended to exhibit the folly of OpenAI’s newfound love of closed-source development in today’s rapidly modern AGI sector, and to label people like Khosla “AI authoritarians.”
Who controls generative AI has turn into an increasingly hotly debated topic amid a gold rush that has pushed the valuation of AI chipmaker Nvidia to $2 trillion. Musk initially helped found and fund OpenAI in December 2015 as a response to Google, the embodiment of the dominant closed-source AI company.
Since then, Google has fallen behind and now not threatens to dominate the business AI market. Indeed, the Bard AI tool, now called Gemini, has sparked controversy over “unacceptable” instances of reverse racism in its algorithmic biases. She also sparked a political row with India after she quoted experts who described Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s policies as “fascist.”
Andreessen identified that the Delhi government has now mandated that each one firms seeking to implement AI and next-generation AI must obtain it prior approval from the country’s IT ministry.
Credit : fortune.com
